Anderson's Revised  Taxonomy

During the 1990's, Lorin Anderson (a former student of Benjamin Bloom) led a team of cognitive psychologists in revisiting the taxonomy with the view to examining the relevance of the taxonomy as we enter the twenty-first century.

As a result of the investigation a number of significant improvements were made to the existing structure. Before turning to examples of how the newly revised Taxonomy may be applied, it would be appropriate at this point to make both the revisions and reasons for the changes explicit.Figure1 below describes both the ‘old' and the ‘new' taxonomies:

REMEMBERING

Recognise, list, describe, identify retrieve, name ….

Can the student RECALL information?

UNDERSTANDING

Interpret, exemplify, summarise, infer, paraphrase …..

Can the student EXPLAIN ideas or concepts?

APPLYING

Implement, carry out, use …

Can the student USE the new knowledge in another familiar situation?

ANALYSING

Compare, attribute, organise, deconstruct …

Can the student DIFFERENTIATE between constituent parts?

EVALUATING

Check, critique, judge hypothesise ...

Can the student JUSTIFY a decision or course of action?

CREATING

Design, construct, plan, produce ...

Can the student GENERATE new products, ideas or ways of viewing things ?

 

 

Bloom's Original Taxonomy Anderson's Revised Taxonomy

Knowledge

Remembering

Comprehension

Understanding

Application

Applying

Analysis

Analysing

Synthesis

Evaluating

Evaluation

Creating


 

Figure 1 – The original taxonomy and the revised taxonomy

Some of the more significant changes include changes in terminology, structure and emphasis. Summarising each in turn –

 

Changes in Terminology

1. As depicted in the previous table, the names of six major categories were changed from noun to verb forms. The reasoning behind this is that the taxonomy reflects different forms of thinking and thinking is an active process. Verbs describe actions, not nouns, hence the change.

2. The subcategories of the six major categories were also replaced by verbs and some subcategories were reorganised.

3. The knowledge category was renamed. Knowledge is an outcome or product of thinking not a form of thinking per se. Consequently, the word knowledge was inappropriate to describe a category of thinking and was replaced with the word remembering instead.

4. Comprehension and synthesis were retitled to understanding and creating respectively, in order to better reflect the nature of the thinking defined in each category.

 

Changes in Structure

1. The one- dimensional form of the original taxonomy becomes a two-dimensional table with the addition of the products of thinking ( i.e. various forms of knowledge). Forms of knowledge are listed in the revised taxonomy as factual, conceptual, procedural and metacognitive. See Learning to think / Thinking to learn (Pohl, 2000) for further information about this.

2 The major categories were ordered in terms of increased complexity. As a result, the order of synthesis (create) and evaluation (evaluate) have been interchanged. This is in deference to the popularly held notion that if one considers the taxonomy as a hierarchy reflecting increasing complexity, then creative thinking (i.e. creating level of the revised taxonomy) is a more complex form of thinking than critical thinking (i.e. evaluating level of the new taxonomy).

Put quite simply, one can be critical without being creative (i.e. judge an idea and justify choices) but creative production often requires critical thinking (i.e. accepting and rejecting ideas on the path to creating a new idea, product or way of looking at things.)

 

Changes in emphasis

1. The revision's primary focus is on the taxonomy in use. Essentially, this means that the revised taxonomy is a more authentic tool for curriculum planning, instructional delivery and assessment.

2. The revision is aimed at a broader audience. Bloom's Taxonomy was traditionally viewed as a tool best applied in the earlier years of schooling (i.e. primary and junior primary years). The revised taxonomy is more universal and easily applicable at elementary, secondary and even tertiary levels.

3. The revision emphasizes explanation and description of subcategories.

For example, sub-categories at the Remembering level of the taxonomy include :

Recognising / Identifying - Locating knowledge in memory that is consistent with presented material.

Recalling / Retrieving / Naming – Retrieving relevant knowledge from long-term memory.

 

The figure below gives a comprehensive overview of the sub-categories, along with some suggested question starters that aim to evoke thinking specific to each level of the taxonomy. Suggested potential activities and student products are also listed.

Category

Sample sentence starters

Potential activities and products

REMEMBER

Recognising

Locating knowledge in memory that is consistent with presented material.

Synonyms: Identifying...

Recalling

Retrieving relevant knowledge from long-term memory.

Synonyms : Retrieving….

Naming…...

REMEMBER

Recognising

Locating knowledge in memory that is consistent with presented material.

Synonyms: Identifying...

Recalling

Retrieving relevant knowledge from long-term memory.

Synonyms : Retrieving….

Naming…...

 

What happened after...?

How many...?

What is...?

Who was it that...?

Can you name ...?

Find the meaning of…

Describe what happened after…

Who spoke to...?

Which is true or false...?

Identify who….

Name all the…..

Make a list of the main events of the story.

Make a time line of events.

Make a facts chart .

Write a list of any pieces of information you can remember.

What animals were in the story.

Make a chart showing…

Make an acrostic.

Recite a poem.

 

 

UNDERSTAND

Interpreting

Changing from one form of representation to another

Synonyms:

Paraphrasing… Translating,...Representing,… Clarifying...

Exemplifying

Finding a specific example or illustration of a concept or principle

Synonyms :

Instantiating… Illustrating...

Classifying

Determining that something belongs to a category (e.g., concept or principle).

Synonyms :

Categorising...Subsuming...

Summarising

Drawing a logical conclusion from presented information.

Synonyms :

Abstracting… Generalising...

Inferring

Abstracting a general theme or major point

Synonyms :

Extrapolating… Interpolating.. Predicting… Concluding….

Comparing

Detecting correspondences between two ideas, objects, etc

Synonyms :

Contrasting… Matching ...Mapping...

Explaining

Constructing a cause-and-effect model of a system.

Synonyms :

Constructing models...

Can you write in your own words?

How would you explain…?

Can you write a brief outline...?

What do you think could have happened next...?

Who do you think...?

What was the main idea...?

Clarify why….

Illustrate the ………

Does everyone act in the way that …….. does?

Draw a story map.

Explain why a character acted in the way that they did.

 

 

 

Cut out, or draw pictures to show a

particular event.

Illustrate what you think the main idea may have been.

Make a cartoon strip showing the sequence

of events.

Write and perform a play based on the story.

Retell the story in your own words.

Write a summary report of the event

Prepare a flow chart to illustrate the

sequence of events.

Make a colouring book.

Cut out, or draw pictures to show a particular event. Illustrate what you think the main idea was.

Make a cartoon strip showing the sequence of events.

Write and perform a play based on the story.

Retell the story in your own words.

Write a summary report of the event

Prepare a flow chart to illustrate the sequence of events.

Cut out, or draw pictures to show a particular event. Illustrate what you think the main idea was.

Make a cartoon strip showing the sequence of events.

Write and perform a play based on the story.

 

APPLY

Executing

Applying knowledge (often procedural) to a routine task.

Synonyms : Carrying out….

Implementing

Applying knowledge (often procedural) to a non-routine task.

Synonyms : Using…..

 

Can you write in your own words?

How would you explain…?

Can you write a brief outline...?

What do you think could have happened next...?

Who do you think...?

What was the main idea...?

Clarify why….

Illustrate the ………

Does everyone act in the way that …….. does?

Draw a story map.

Explain why a character acted in the way that they did.

Construct a model to demonstrate how it works

Make a diorama to illustrate an event

Make a scrapbook about the areas of study.

Make a papier-mâché map / clay model to include relevant information about an event.

Take a collection of photographs to demonstrate a particular point.

Make up a puzzle game.

Write a textbook about this topic for others.

ANALYSE

Differentiating

Distinguishing relevant from irrelevant parts or important from unimportant parts of presented material.

Synonyms : Discriminating, Selecting, Focusing, Distinguishing,

Organising

Determining how elements fit or function within a structure.

Synonyms : Outlining, Structuring, Integrating, Finding coherence

Attributing

Determining the point of view, bias, values, or intent underlying presented material. Synonyms : Deconstructing

Which events could not have happened?

If. ..happened, what might the ending have been?

How is...similar to...?

What do you see as other possible outcomes?

Why did...changes occur?

Can you explain what must have happened when...?

What are some or the problems of...?

Can you distinguish between...?

What were some of the motives behind..?

What was the turning point?

What was the problem with...?

Design a questionnaire to gather information.

Write a commercial to sell a new product

Make flow chart to show the critical stages.

Construct a graph to illustrate selected information.

Make a family tree showing relationships.

Devise a play about the study area.

Write a biography of a person studied.

Prepare a report about the area of study.

EVALUATE

Checking

Detecting inconsistencies or fallacies within a process or product.

Determining whether a process or product has internal consistency.

Synonyms : Testing, Detecting, Monitoring

Critiquing

Detecting the appropriateness of a procedure for a given task or problem.

Synonyms :Judging

 

Is there a better solution to...?

Judge the value of... What do you think about...?

Can you defend your position about...?

Do you think...is a good or bad thing?

How would you have handled...?

What changes to.. would you recommend?

Do you believe...? How would you feel if. ..?

How effective are. ..?

 

 

 

Conduct a debate about an issue of special interest.

Make a booklet about five rules you see as important. Convince others.

Form a panel to discuss views.

Write a letter to. ..advising on changes needed.

Write a half-year report.

Prepare a case to present your view about...

CREATE

Generating

Coming up with alternatives or hypotheses based on criteria

Synonyms : Hypothesizing

Planning

Devising a procedure for accomplishing some task. producing

Synonyms : Designing

Producing

Inventing a product.

Synonyms : Constructing

Can you design a...to...?

Can you see a possible solution to...?

If you had access to all resources, how would you deal with...?

Why don't you devise your own way to...?

What would happen if ...?

How many ways can you...?

Can you create new and unusual uses for...?

Can you develop a proposal which would...?

 

 

Invent a machine to do a specific task.

Design a building to house your study.

Create a new product. Give it a name and plan a marketing campaign.

Write about your feelings in relation to...

Write a TV show play, puppet show, role play, song or pantomime about..

Design a record, book or magazine cover for...

Sell an idea

Devise a way to...